224-1 Measurements of glacial erosion rates: Pitfalls, uncertainties, and strategies for comparing erosion rates derived from different methods
Session: From the Cosmos and Back: Quantifying Processes and Rates of Landscape Change (Posters)
Poster Booth No.: 210
Presenting Author:
Jeremy BrooksAuthors:
Brooks, Jeremy Patrick1, Marcott, Shaun2, Zoet, Lucas3(1) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, (2) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, (3) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA,
Abstract:
Rates of glacial erosion are measured in a variety of ways, including: (i) the flux of sediments in proglacial streams, (ii) the volume of sediments accumulated in proglacial basins, the exhumation of bedrock recorded by (iii) cosmogenic nuclides or (iv) low temperature thermochronometers, and (v) the relief or morphology of glacial landscapes. Comparing erosion rates across methods is difficult because each method fundamentally measures a different indirect phenomenon purported to reflect glacial erosion. This is of particular concern because each method is typically applied to different timescales (ranging from ~100 to 107 years), meaning that the inferred timescale-dependence (Koppes and Montgomery, 2009) or lack thereof (Wilner et al., 2024) of glacial erosion rates may be obscured by biases or limitations inherent to each measurement method. Here, we expand upon and refine existing compilations of glacial erosion rates, and contextualize the information gained from each measurement method to identify likely sources of over- or under-estimates of subglacial bedrock erosion. We categorize erosion rate measurements based on the glacial erosional environment (e.g. Sugden, 1974) to identify confounding variables that may bias the inferred timescale dependence of glacial erosion rates. We suggest strategies for comparing erosion rates derived from different methods that attempts to reconcile the different physical phenomena measured. We conclude that uncertainties are considerable when comparing glacial erosion rates across different methods, motivating future field studies designed to directly compare erosion rates from multiple independent methods.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6, 2025
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-7277
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved.
Measurements of glacial erosion rates: Pitfalls, uncertainties, and strategies for comparing erosion rates derived from different methods
Category
Topical Sessions
Description
Session Format: Poster
Presentation Date: 10/21/2025
Presentation Room: HBGCC, Hall 1
Poster Booth No.: 210
Author Availability: 3:30–5:30 p.m.
Back to Session