282-11 Critical Appraisal of Trace Element Thermobarometers – Some are Fine, but Several are Thermodynamically Unsound
Session: Crustal Petrology, Part II
Presenting Author:
Matthew KohnAuthor:
Kohn, Matthew J.1(1) Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA,
Abstract:
Trace element thermobarometry now serves as a standard for characterizing P-T conditions spanning the upper mantle to upper crust. Some equilibria – especially Zr-in-rutile, Zr-in-titanite, Ti-in-quartz, Ti-in-zircon, Ni-in-garnet and Ni-in-olivine – have well-founded thermodynamic formulations, and applications have firm observational and theoretical bases. However, other trace element calibrations lack a sound thermodynamic foundation, and any P-T interpretations should be treated skeptically. Three key requirements for thermodynamically valid thermobarometers are that they must represent (1) a balanced chemical reaction, expressed (2) among mineral phase components that (3) satisfy crystal-chemical controls on trace element substitution. . These requirements are missing from many calibrations.
Problematic thermobarometers include REE exchange for garnet-clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene-clinopyroxene, and plagioclase-clinopyroxene, as well as Ti-in-biotite and Ti-in-hornblende. These thermobarometers lack chemically balanced reactions among phase components, so are thermodynamically faulty. For Ti-in-biotite and Ti-in-hornblende, thermodynamically valid calibrations for balanced chemical reactions do exist (Chambers and Kohn, 2012; Am Min), but Ti contents depend too strongly on mineral composition and too weakly on temperature to be useful for thermometry. Simplified chemical reactions proposed for REE thermobarometers violate crystal chemistry (they do not represent equilibria among mineral phase components) and do not reflect two-mineral systems, instead implicitly requiring the presence of melt. More generally, current REE calibrations rely on partition coefficients rather than equilibrium constants, which does not accurately account for the effects of chemical mixing in minerals or chemistry of all crystallographic sites. Application of the REE garnet-clinopyroxene thermobarometer to well-equilibrated experiments and natural rocks leads to thermometric errors of hundreds of degrees, and barometric errors of tens of kbar, compromising the usefulness of the current calibration.
Advances in trace element thermobarometry will require stricter adherence to thermodynamic principles and further investigation of substitution mechanisms of trace elements in minerals. Some substitutions are straightforward (e.g., Ni2+ substitutes simply for Mg2+ in olivine and garnet), others are not (olivine has two possible Al substitution mechanisms). Strategies for assessing substitution mechanisms and mixing models are straightforward, e.g., REE diffusion rates in typical garnet and pyroxene are too fast to permit charge-coupling to tetrahedral Al via tschermaks- or YAG-type components. Instead, chemical and partitioning data strongly support Na+REE coupled substitution to produce, for example, a (Na·REE·Ca)Al2Si3O12 component in garnet. However, these methods must be implemented more consistently.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program. Vol. 57, No. 6, 2025
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-7589
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved.
Critical Appraisal of Trace Element Thermobarometers – Some are Fine, but Several are Thermodynamically Unsound
Category
Topical Sessions
Description
Session Format: Oral
Presentation Date: 10/22/2025
Presentation Start Time: 04:30 PM
Presentation Room: HBGCC, 216AB
Back to Session