214-3 The Same and Not the Same: A Tale of Two Contrasting Origins of Methane-Derived Authigenic Calcite and Their Implications on Neoproterozoic Carbon Cycle

Session: The Neoproterozoic Earth and Life Co-evolution, Part II

Presenting Author:

Huan Cui

Authors:

Cui, Huan¹, Kitajima, Kouki², Orland, Ian J. ³, Baele, Jean-Marc⁴, Kaufman, Alan Jay⁵, Xiao, Shuhai⁶, Denny, Adam⁷, Spicuzza, Michael J. ⁸, Fournelle, John H. ⁹, Goderis, Steven¹⁰, de Winter, Niels J.¹¹, Valley, John W. ¹²

(1) Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA, (2) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, (3) Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, (4) Department of Geology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium, (5) Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, (6) Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, (7) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA, (8) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, (9) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, (10) Archaeology, Environmental Changes & Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, (11) Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, (12) Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA,

Abstract:

Methane has long been regarded as a key greenhouse gas modulating Earth’s paleoclimate. Notably, methane-derived authigenic calcite (MDAC) cements, characterized by extremely low carbon isotopic values (δ¹³C_carb < –30‰), have been reported from both the basal (within post-Marinoan cap dolostones) and upper (within the EN3 interval) parts of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation in South China. These anomalous geochemical signals have been proposed to bear profound implications for methane’s critical role in global biogeochemical cycles. However, the origin and diagenetic history of these MDACs remain ambiguous due to the lack of detailed petrographic and geochemical investigations at a micron scale.

Our new results reveal contrasting origins for MDAC cements. In the basal Doushantuo Formation, the MDAC cements (δ¹³C_carb down to –53.1‰) are post-depositional, void-filling, and rich in Mn. Importantly, petrographic and SIMS results consistently show that MDAC cements post-date disrupted dolomite laminae that bear surprisingly positive δ¹³C_carb values up to +6.3‰. This is the first report of positive δ¹³C_carb signals within post-Marinoan cap dolostone. The dolomite laminae and MDAC cements thus represent distinct post-depositional, exogenous, diagenetic carbon signals unrelated to Maronian deglaciation. Our findings challenge the hypothesis that methane played a central role at the end of, or immediately following, the Marinoan glaciation. Instead, methane infiltration into cap dolostones may have occurred at a relatively later stage.

In contrast, SIMS results of MDACs in the upper Doushantuo reveal remarkable micron-scale heterogeneity of δ¹³C_carb (with values down to –37.5‰) at outer shelf shoal settings. We interpret these calcite cements as resulting from microbial sulfate reduction and anaerobic oxidation of methane during syndepositional or early diagenesis. These findings suggest that the heterogeneous expressions of the Shuram excursion in South China — manifest on micrometer, centimeter, and basinal scales — was modulated by methane oxidation under variable local redox and water depth conditions. The Shuram excursion, therefore, was coupled with different degrees of methane oxidation in individual basins and globally triggered by enhanced seawater sulfate during an atmospheric oxygenation event.

Our study demonstrates that SIMS can distinguish different generations of isotopically distinct carbonate cements and, therefore, is an effective approach to assess the origin and diagenetic history of carbon isotope anomalies in the sedimentary record.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6, 2025

doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-5209

© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved.